top of page
  • Writer's pictureStefan Schmierer

International Chamber of Commerce Innovates

On 1 December 2020, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) published the latest version of its Arbitration Rules, which came into force on 1 January 2021. As Hong Kong is one of the world's leading centres for arbitration and many proceedings in Hong Kong are conducted under the ICC Rules, these innovations are of particular interest to Hong Kong.


The most important changes are about remote hearings, litigation funding and complex proceedings.


Disclosure Requirement for Litigation Funding


According to the new Article 11 (7), parties are now obliged to disclose litigation funding. This applies not only to the existence of such, but also to the disclosure of the identity of the financier. This rule goes beyond the rules of the Stockholm Arbitration Chamber, which only requires disclosure of financing, but does not go as far as the rule of the Hong Kong Arbitration Centre, which also requires disclosure of the agreement itself.


This is innovation brings the advantage that a possible conflict of interest between the parties, the financier and the arbitrators can thus be excluded from the outset. Accordingly, Article 17 (2) of the new rules then also provides that the arbitral tribunal may make any order to prevent a conflict of interest.


Remote Hearings, E-Filings Strengthened


In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was practically impossible to omit changes in remote hearings. Whereas this issue was previously only rudimentarily regulated, Article 26 (1) now provides that the arbitral tribunal may, after hearing the parties, order hearings via video or telephone conferences, regardless of whether the parties agree to this or not.


At the same time, it has been regulated (Articles 4 (4)(b), 5(3)) that all motions, pleadings, etc. must be filed electronically, if a party does not request that its documents be filed in paper form. This is a clear departure from the previous rules, which assumed paper filing as the rule


Consolidation of Different Proceedings


There are further changes for complex proceedings involving multiple parties. According to Article 7(5), from now on, even after the arbitral tribunal has already constituted itself, new parties may be admitted to the proceedings. Furthermore, the arbitral tribunal may consolidate different proceedings provided the parties are the same, the subject matter of the proceedings is based on the same facts and the arbitral tribunal is of the opinion that consolidation is appropriate. Previously, consolidation was only possible if the claims arose from the same arbitration agreement.


New Rules Reflect Recent Social Developments


The new orders signal a positive advancement of ICC Rules, as they reflect the necessary changes that have resulted from the social developments of recent months. The ICC Rules, with these changes, will continue to be arbitration rules that can be applied in good conscience.


Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this article it is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice of any kind. You should seek your own personal legal advice before taking legal action. We accept no liability whatsoever for loss arising out of the use or misuse of this article.



RS_International Chamber of Commerce Innovates Abritration
.pdf
Download PDF • 194KB

The Merits of (Pre-)Mediation

Mediation in litigation has evolved over the last decade, with facilitative and sometimes evaluative mediation styles being used. Pre-mediation meetings have become a significant trend, allowing media

The Conduct of Mediation

While mediation develops differently in each jurisdiction, the global pandemic has introduced the worldwide practice of online mediation – a change that is here to stay. As a consequence, the importan

bottom of page